<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Are Your Pet Photography Peeves?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veganrawfood</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-227214</link>
		<dc:creator>Veganrawfood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 06:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-227214</guid>
		<description>My pet peeve is low light!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pet peeve is low light!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-136852</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-136852</guid>
		<description>Biggest pet peeve is when some one makes a very unintelligent comment on your photo, and the says its &quot;constructive criticism&quot; then you look at their photos and they are not at all the greatest and they lack any skill or creativity. Critiquing is a good thing when the person critiquing actually understands photography and is a brilliant photographer themselves, but making dumb, unintelligent and sometimes even rude comments on other peoples photos isn&#039;t going to make you a better photographer, so shut up and focus on your on photography. If you dont like someone&#039;s photo move on to the next photo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biggest pet peeve is when some one makes a very unintelligent comment on your photo, and the says its &#8220;constructive criticism&#8221; then you look at their photos and they are not at all the greatest and they lack any skill or creativity. Critiquing is a good thing when the person critiquing actually understands photography and is a brilliant photographer themselves, but making dumb, unintelligent and sometimes even rude comments on other peoples photos isn&#8217;t going to make you a better photographer, so shut up and focus on your on photography. If you dont like someone&#8217;s photo move on to the next photo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PuReAnGeL</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-67403</link>
		<dc:creator>PuReAnGeL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-67403</guid>
		<description>My pet peeve is to read other people&#039;s pet peeve lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pet peeve is to read other people&#8217;s pet peeve lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-66041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-66041</guid>
		<description>Oh yes I forgot to mention that I do agree that good equipment is way too expensive. And you do need good equipment, even though you can achieve some good results with less sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes I forgot to mention that I do agree that good equipment is way too expensive. And you do need good equipment, even though you can achieve some good results with less sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-66040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-66040</guid>
		<description>Interesting list. 

Well I cannot complain about HDR because I&#039;ve been taking lots of HDR lately, but it&#039;s still mainly because of the novelty or else if I&#039;m in a place that is hard to expose properly (e.g. inside a church). 

I find that Flickr comments are similar to a large circle of people patting the back of the person to their right. Often it doesn&#039;t do much to help other people&#039;s photography, it just helps people get accepted in groups on the internet via yet another channel. Yes it&#039;s nice to get praise for one&#039;s snaps but I didn&#039;t take the picture so the people in the landscape community would like me. 

Watermarks can be useful if you&#039;re trying to sell pictures on the internet. Once again I use them sometimes on my webspace, even though you supposedly cannot save pictures from it. You know, just in case. 

Excessive photoshopping can be annoying especially if you know that the individual is just snapping away without thinking. Its not the editing itself. Knowing that a photo starts itself as a mindless snapshot of a potentially inyteresting subject and them moulded into something decent annoys me. starting this hobby made me really appreciate my surroundings so much more. Losing that to think about how one&#039;s going to make things look better later is a bit soulless. The exception to that would be product or stock photography I guess, where you kind of have to think on those lines.

Finally I don&#039;t like people who are patronizing about photography. I&#039;m talking about the people who try to give the impression that they hold the key to the secret knowledge behind a great photo. The people who would only state exif data without saying why(or if it is the right exif data) and lying about any editing or post-processing, and the same people who would shoot down any attempt to &quot;replicate their talent&quot;.

Anyway, this is quickly turning into a rant so I&#039;ll stop there. Glad I could get it out of my system though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting list. </p>
<p>Well I cannot complain about HDR because I&#8217;ve been taking lots of HDR lately, but it&#8217;s still mainly because of the novelty or else if I&#8217;m in a place that is hard to expose properly (e.g. inside a church). </p>
<p>I find that Flickr comments are similar to a large circle of people patting the back of the person to their right. Often it doesn&#8217;t do much to help other people&#8217;s photography, it just helps people get accepted in groups on the internet via yet another channel. Yes it&#8217;s nice to get praise for one&#8217;s snaps but I didn&#8217;t take the picture so the people in the landscape community would like me. </p>
<p>Watermarks can be useful if you&#8217;re trying to sell pictures on the internet. Once again I use them sometimes on my webspace, even though you supposedly cannot save pictures from it. You know, just in case. </p>
<p>Excessive photoshopping can be annoying especially if you know that the individual is just snapping away without thinking. Its not the editing itself. Knowing that a photo starts itself as a mindless snapshot of a potentially inyteresting subject and them moulded into something decent annoys me. starting this hobby made me really appreciate my surroundings so much more. Losing that to think about how one&#8217;s going to make things look better later is a bit soulless. The exception to that would be product or stock photography I guess, where you kind of have to think on those lines.</p>
<p>Finally I don&#8217;t like people who are patronizing about photography. I&#8217;m talking about the people who try to give the impression that they hold the key to the secret knowledge behind a great photo. The people who would only state exif data without saying why(or if it is the right exif data) and lying about any editing or post-processing, and the same people who would shoot down any attempt to &#8220;replicate their talent&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway, this is quickly turning into a rant so I&#8217;ll stop there. Glad I could get it out of my system though <img src='http://www.digital-photography-school.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniela</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-66011</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-66011</guid>
		<description>People who claim that equipment doesn´t make a difference, &quot;it´s only the person behind the camera that does&quot;. Whatever!!! Wouldn´t a nature photographer need the most stable tripod in the market to make good shots in windy weather?! The examples are endless. I mean, if your point and shoot is good enough for the situation you are shooting in, then great. But what if you´re shooting in somewhere not so bright and need a 1.4 lens to do the trick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who claim that equipment doesn´t make a difference, &#8220;it´s only the person behind the camera that does&#8221;. Whatever!!! Wouldn´t a nature photographer need the most stable tripod in the market to make good shots in windy weather?! The examples are endless. I mean, if your point and shoot is good enough for the situation you are shooting in, then great. But what if you´re shooting in somewhere not so bright and need a 1.4 lens to do the trick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hoey Jnr</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-66008</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hoey Jnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-66008</guid>
		<description>My Pet Peeve.... Simple Camera Phones, They Should Be Destroyed

ImageOfTheEye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Pet Peeve&#8230;. Simple Camera Phones, They Should Be Destroyed</p>
<p>ImageOfTheEye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W.</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-65981</link>
		<dc:creator>John W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-65981</guid>
		<description>My pet peeve is people telling me that taking pictures is easy, just get a p&amp;s or camera phone and start snapping.  Photography is not easy, because doing it right is hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pet peeve is people telling me that taking pictures is easy, just get a p&amp;s or camera phone and start snapping.  Photography is not easy, because doing it right is hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-65960</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-65960</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Eddie wholeheartedly on this one.  &quot;#1 Pet Peeve - People deciding what techniques are appropriate in somebody else&#039;s art .&quot;  

What would have happened to Van Gogh&#039;a paintings if he heeded advice from another artist on where the subject&#039;s eyes should be??

True art really doesn&#039;t have any specific &quot;rules&quot; to speak of and is (or should be) subective only.  I consider photography an art.  Sure, it helps to be educated on your equipment, post processing techniques, composition, etc., but in the end, our work comes from the heart and soul, born out of ideas of what looks pleasing to us.  Fellow photographer&#039;s should stop picking apart other people&#039;s art and making suggestions on how to &quot;fix&quot; it.  I proudly posted a photo on a forum that I really liked and the client really liked, just to have another photographer &quot;borrow&quot; it, &quot;fix&quot; it and repost as a better example of the shot.  I thought it looked horrible.  But the helpful fellow didn&#039;t.  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Eddie wholeheartedly on this one.  &#8220;#1 Pet Peeve &#8211; People deciding what techniques are appropriate in somebody else&#8217;s art .&#8221;  </p>
<p>What would have happened to Van Gogh&#8217;a paintings if he heeded advice from another artist on where the subject&#8217;s eyes should be??</p>
<p>True art really doesn&#8217;t have any specific &#8220;rules&#8221; to speak of and is (or should be) subective only.  I consider photography an art.  Sure, it helps to be educated on your equipment, post processing techniques, composition, etc., but in the end, our work comes from the heart and soul, born out of ideas of what looks pleasing to us.  Fellow photographer&#8217;s should stop picking apart other people&#8217;s art and making suggestions on how to &#8220;fix&#8221; it.  I proudly posted a photo on a forum that I really liked and the client really liked, just to have another photographer &#8220;borrow&#8221; it, &#8220;fix&#8221; it and repost as a better example of the shot.  I thought it looked horrible.  But the helpful fellow didn&#8217;t.  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/what-are-your-pet-photography-peeves/comment-page-3#comment-65924</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8738#comment-65924</guid>
		<description>What drives me up a wall are so-called Pros that only use the Program. Working with a news papers I could not believe it, myself and 3 other photographers use Manual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What drives me up a wall are so-called Pros that only use the Program. Working with a news papers I could not believe it, myself and 3 other photographers use Manual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.156 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 443/451 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-14 20:05:41 -->
