<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lenses We Would Have If We Could Have No Other Lenses [POLL RESULTS]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:06:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Pratap</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-124275</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Pratap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 06:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-124275</guid>
		<description>Great idea to generate this list. And yes, Chris answered absolutely right =P

50mm f 1.4 is a MUST HAVE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea to generate this list. And yes, Chris answered absolutely right =P</p>
<p>50mm f 1.4 is a MUST HAVE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-117138</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-117138</guid>
		<description>I am just about to walk out of the house to buy the Nikon 35m. 1.8 so am very happy to see it made it onto the list! Thanks for the informative post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just about to walk out of the house to buy the Nikon 35m. 1.8 so am very happy to see it made it onto the list! Thanks for the informative post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Hyam</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-74039</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Hyam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-74039</guid>
		<description>I was happy to see the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX nestling about half way down with 8 votes. This is a great very affordable 35 m lens. On an aps sensor like the Nikon D40 it tranforms the excellent little entry level DSLR into a class act. It is of course the equivalent of roughly 50m on a full sized sensor or film SLR.
Very creative thinking on Nikon&#039;s part!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was happy to see the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX nestling about half way down with 8 votes. This is a great very affordable 35 m lens. On an aps sensor like the Nikon D40 it tranforms the excellent little entry level DSLR into a class act. It is of course the equivalent of roughly 50m on a full sized sensor or film SLR.<br />
Very creative thinking on Nikon&#8217;s part!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug McKay</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-73812</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-73812</guid>
		<description>OK, I was going to just read, but there have been more than a few comments that price might have been a factor.  I have lets say a number of lenses.  It does not seem to matter if it is and hour or and adventure, I bring more than a few thousand dollars worth of photo equipment counting body and lens , tripod not included.  The question was what was the ONE lens.  I had a feeling, but also did a few searches of my thousands of images and the truth was 18-200, not my most expensive lens nor my least expensive lens  just the one that records what my mind is seeing 77.6% of the time.  So by scientific method I proved my &quot;feeling&quot;- IF I had one it would have to be my Nikon 18-20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I was going to just read, but there have been more than a few comments that price might have been a factor.  I have lets say a number of lenses.  It does not seem to matter if it is and hour or and adventure, I bring more than a few thousand dollars worth of photo equipment counting body and lens , tripod not included.  The question was what was the ONE lens.  I had a feeling, but also did a few searches of my thousands of images and the truth was 18-200, not my most expensive lens nor my least expensive lens  just the one that records what my mind is seeing 77.6% of the time.  So by scientific method I proved my &#8220;feeling&#8221;- IF I had one it would have to be my Nikon 18-20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Reinier Lino</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-73671</link>
		<dc:creator>James Reinier Lino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-73671</guid>
		<description>Thanks as a newbie now I know what lenses to pursue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks as a newbie now I know what lenses to pursue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steadyfromoz</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-73662</link>
		<dc:creator>steadyfromoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-73662</guid>
		<description>WOW! The 2 top lenses just happens to be the first 2 lenses I ever bought for my Nikon D300 and I can only add to the other posters here and say just how versatile and effective they really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! The 2 top lenses just happens to be the first 2 lenses I ever bought for my Nikon D300 and I can only add to the other posters here and say just how versatile and effective they really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed in Philly</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-73660</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed in Philly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-73660</guid>
		<description>I threw my Nikkor 18-200 in my bag at the last minute when we went to Italy a couple weeks ago. I must admit that most of the time I did use the Nikkor 17-55/2.8, but I was really glad to have it during 2 days of rain in Venice and I didn&#039;t have to do the lens change dance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I threw my Nikkor 18-200 in my bag at the last minute when we went to Italy a couple weeks ago. I must admit that most of the time I did use the Nikkor 17-55/2.8, but I was really glad to have it during 2 days of rain in Venice and I didn&#8217;t have to do the lens change dance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kem</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-73631</link>
		<dc:creator>kem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-73631</guid>
		<description>the 18-250 Sony good range Lens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 18-250 Sony good range Lens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greggn</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-73618</link>
		<dc:creator>greggn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-73618</guid>
		<description>The Canon 35/1.4L is my most used, go-to lens.  If I had to, I could use it exclusively for the rest of my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canon 35/1.4L is my most used, go-to lens.  If I had to, I could use it exclusively for the rest of my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarfel T. Garthug</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/the-lenses-we-would-have-if-we-could-have-no-other-lenses-poll-results/comment-page-1#comment-73600</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarfel T. Garthug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10368#comment-73600</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that there were only 3 people who chose and 85mm fixed (my personal favorite) and nobody mentioned a 105mm fixed, as they are touted as the most popular portrait focal lengths.  I also didn&#039;t expect the 50mm fixed to be so popular. As a follow up survey, I wonder how many people are getting the approx. 100mm from a crop sensor. It may explain the popularity of the 50mm over the 85 and 105mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that there were only 3 people who chose and 85mm fixed (my personal favorite) and nobody mentioned a 105mm fixed, as they are touted as the most popular portrait focal lengths.  I also didn&#8217;t expect the 50mm fixed to be so popular. As a follow up survey, I wonder how many people are getting the approx. 100mm from a crop sensor. It may explain the popularity of the 50mm over the 85 and 105mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/21 queries in 0.145 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 445/453 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-15 05:48:25 -->
