Sigma DP1s Digital Camera Review
A guest Review of the Sigma DP1s by Patrick Dean from NeutralDay.com.
The idea is simple really. Put a large sensor inside a small compact body and you’ve got a camera that enthusiasts can carry around easily and still secure the same level of quality from their captures as they would from their larger DSLR camera. Recently a number of cameras have been released that fit this bill, but just a short time ago, Sigma was flying solo in this market sector with DP1.
Using the unique Foveon X3 sensor, the DP1 offered users a 28mm equivalent lens, excellent image quality, all in a fairly compact body. The “DP” lineup was then augmented with the DP2, which provided the same sensor technology and form factor, but brought users a 41mm f/2.8 lens, along with some improved functionality (a quick set feature). Now Sigma has in effect refreshed the DP1 by adding the DP2′s quick set feature and improving the DP1′s ability to shoot backlit subjects. Though this review is of the DP1s, it largely applies to the DP2 and DP1 as well. The key differences will boil down to the users lens length preference, remember the DP1s offers a 28mm f/4, while the DP2 provides 41mm length at f/2.8. Image quality and usage is essentially identical.
Sigma DP1s Highlights

DSLR sized full color sensor: The DP1s uses the Foveon X3 sensor, which at 20.7mm x 13.8mm is much larger than a compact sensor. The X3 is a full color sensor, and unlike the Bayer sensors found in most DSLR cameras doesn’t require demosaicing. Sigma claims the Foveon X3 used in the DP1s is a 14 megapixel sensor, but in dimensions it is actually a 4.7 megapixel sensor, while in resolution it appears to offer about 10 megapixels. Long story short: the X3 takes high quality, but modestly size images that are full of detail, while offering a certain unique “look”.
28mm f/4 lens: The DP1s is perfect for wide angle fans, and is well suited for landscape work. The lens manages distortion and flare quite well for a wide angle.
RAW and JPEG recording: The DP series offers the ability to record RAW files, as well as JPEG files (though not RAW+JPEG)
Accessorize: With the DP1s, users can opt to accessorize with an external flash (via hot shoe), lens filters, viewfinder, and a number of filters.
In The Hands

The DP1s is a simple black box and is about as minimal as a camera design can be. The front side of the camera offers a slightly dimpled surface for grip and the lens bezel, while the back is home to the 2.5 inch 230k LCD, several camera function buttons, and a multi-directional D-Pad type controller that also doubles for additional camera functions. Up top you have the mode dial, hot shoe, power button, pop-up flash, and shutter release. Overall the DP1s is a solid, well built camera. I do have two gripes with the DP1s (and the other DP models), the first one being the rubber cover that hides the USB port is easily bent out of shape and fails to line up flush with the camera if the cable is left in for too long (though it eventually returns to position). The second complaint is with the lens cap that given a lack of connector, could be easily lost. Neither complaint has stopped us from liking the overall design of the DP1s though, it’s comfortable to hold, good to look at, and able to handle a fair amount of abuse.
Sigma DP1s – In Use

Much like the DP1 and the DP2, the DP1s is a quirky camera to use, to put it nicely. From the typical point and shoot photographer’s point of view, the DP1s will be entirely unsatisfying, and any photographer looking for “AUTO”, or worse “Sunset”, “Birthday”, and “Fireworks” shooting modes should look elsewhere. There is no face detection here, no image stabilization, and no art filters. The DP1s is a “PASM” shooting camera only (Program, Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, and Manual) and is intended for enthusiasts, but specifically enthusiasts with a bias toward image quality rather than user experience. Even for such photographers there will certainly be some frustrations. The LCD remains quite poor, offering low resolution and less than vivid colors. Also the AF, though consistent, is definitely on the slow side, and it can make capturing dynamic and low light subjects quite difficult. But getting past those 2 issues, if you’re used to shooting in a programmed shooting mode, the DP1s is easy to use. The added quick set feature from the DP2 makes changing settings like ISO and WB on the fly very easy, the manual focus dial works quite effectively, and we like being able to bracket shots in the field to ensure having good results when getting back home.

A look at the shooting screen and quick set screen
From a performance point of view, the DP1s is best described as average. It takes several seconds to power up, focus to capture time can take several seconds, and write to card times can also take some time. By now you’re sensing that the DP1s isn’t well suited for run and gun photography, and I’ll admit, it does require some patience. Still the DP1s is a fine performer for doing landscape work and general walk around type photography, and is quite adept at grabbing the little slices of life that is so easily turns into fascinating and unique looking images.
Sigma DP1s – Image Quality

Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60) | Aperture: f/4.0 | Focal Length: 16.6 mm | ISO Speed: 200 | Exposure Bias: +0.3 EV
This is where the DP1s and the Foveon X3 sensor really shine. Open an image up in the included Sigma Photo Pro raw converter software, and be prepared to be quite enthralled with your results. Thanks to its lens and sensor combination, the DP1s can take very sharp photos, full of detail, that frequently take on a 3-D look. Color accuracy is typically a tiny bit off, but usually in an aesthetically pleasing way. In short, the DP1s takes fantastic looking pictures that easily best the best compact and rival many DSLR cameras. Photo Pro is uniquely suited at developing the images too, producing distinctly better results than Adobe’s Lightroom and other RAW editors, but like the camera, Photo Pro can be slow to use. The time is well worth it though, as it doesn’t take very much work at all to dial in crisp, vivid, and extremely dimensional looks from your DP1s captures. It remains hard to describe, but after all the time I’ve spent with various “DP” models, I remain struck with how much different their files look versus any other camera. It doesn’t translate well via the confines of the internet, but there’s definitely something special, and yes, unique about the Foveon “look”.

Note the saturation loss at ISO 800
As for low light performance, the DP1s tops out at ISO 800, but does provide much better results at this level than your average compact. There is a degree of noise to be had past ISO 200, but even at ISO 800 the images are very usable despite having lost considerable saturation. Optically the 28mm lens, is very sharp and handles distortion and flare quite well for a wide angle lens, but you will find some chromatic aberration in the files in areas of contrast.
Conclusion

Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60) | Aperture: f/4.0 | Focal Length: 16.6 mm | ISO Speed: 200 | Exposure Bias: +0.3 EV
Clearly the DP1s is not without it its flaws, but the real question is given the cost, is is worth it. For me personally the answer is unhesitatingly yes. It’s important to reiterate though that I tend to have a strong bias towards image quality, and I’m quite willing to accept the given confines of working with the DP1s in exchange for its unique looking files. To be clear, this camera (or the DP2 if you prefer a longer focal length and shallower depth of field effects) is absolutely not intended for beginners, nor for folks looking for a point and shoot camera/experience. If however, you’re comfortable using a camera manually, and are anxious to turn the everyday and ordinary into works of art, the Sigma DP1s certainly comes “Recommended”.
Sigma DP1s Availability
The Sigma DP1s Digital Camera is currently $619.60 at Amazon.
Additional Sample

Exposure: 0.04 sec (1/25) | Aperture: f/4.0 | Focal Length: 16.6 mm | ISO Speed: 200 | Exposure Bias: +1 EV
About the Author: Patrick Dean is the editor of the photography news and review website, NeutralDay.com. He also frequently tweets at twitter.com/neutralday.




12 Responses to “Sigma DP1s Digital Camera Review” - Add Yours
February 10th, 2010 at 6:04 pm
i don’t really get this review… I mean, the review itself is great, and the camera sounds really nice – but it’s almost two years old!?
February 14th, 2010 at 12:29 am
You’re thinking of the Sigma DP1 with out the “s”.
February 15th, 2010 at 4:07 am
I really want to like this camera as a 2nd camera. I don’t mind the “smallish” resolution, the foven is a really sharp for what I need as a pocket camera. but the sigma line is getting long in the tooth since the m4/3rds have started to mature, and the offerings from Panasonic and Olympus are looking better with each revision.
February 19th, 2010 at 6:10 am
I currently own an E-P2, was an early adopter of the E-P1, and owned a Sigma DP1 for about 4 months before selling it for a Canon S90.
Compared to the Sigma DP1, all these other cameras are noisy. I have tried the Olympus cameras with the 20mm f/1.7 pancake and the kit zoom. The lenses are fine. Certainly the brighter pancake is a big improvement.
But the level of detail, sharpness, and overall — as Patrick aptly puts it — three-dimensionality of the Sigma DP series’ images are second to none.
I thought I needed a faster camera that was ‘better’ in low-light than the Sigma, so I switched to the much-hyped S90. Big mistake: sure, the S90 has a fast lens, but if you use any software other than Canon’s crappy in-the-box software you get pronounced barrel distortion. Of course, because of the typically small sensor, noisy images (even shooting at low ISO, in RAW), are a given.
I will be switching back to a Sigma DP1 very soon: I’ve got my eye on one of the many very good deals on used ones to be had, on eBay.
February 19th, 2010 at 9:56 am
Jonas: as Peter says, the DP1s is new, and it isn’t as you say. the DP1s added some very tiny enhancements, but otherwise is the same as the DP1.
lcs: Use the camera and you’ll like it, if you like IQ. I’m testing both the E-P2 and the G-F1, and they work much better, so much better, but….I prefer the DP2 over either on an IQ basis. ( I like the DP2′s lens over the wide angle DP1/DP1s.)
February 20th, 2010 at 6:00 am
alistair,
Interesting to hear your experience, all the cameras you mentioned are fine cameras, and as I said previously, make taking shots significantly easier than any DPx model. But…the experience of looking at the DPx files on your computer after transfer won’t be equaled by any of those models. Most will prefer better handling and good IQ, but a few of us will take IQ over handling. Of course, I wish I didn’t have to take that compromise, but that’s how it is…right now.
April 2nd, 2010 at 5:40 am
This is a great review and a some interesting comments.
I have a DP1s and one specification change is that the camera now has an ISO 50 setting which is an improvement on the ISO 100 on the DP1. This new setting which together with the latest Sigma Photo Pro 4 software adds even more depth to the images. Actually the combination is a big leap forward in quality and makes some entry level SLR’s look ordinary. The sensor captures a richness of texture that my wifes Canon 50D can not achieve.
But the camera is too slow and pedantic for most people compared with all the competition. You have to think about the settings and you have to wait while the camera focuses or save the files. Compared to a modern point and shoot cameras it is sluggishly slow.
I also have a Nikon S8000 which is a great modern point and shoot camera. But for all of its simplicity, speed and accuracy, it will never capture an image of the quality the Sima can capture.
For me, the Nikon satisfies the instant gratification that the moden world demands. The Sigma will capture a memory that you might actually want to frame and hang on your wall. My screen saver was taken with the Sigma for example.
If you understand the basics of how a camera works and if you want a high quality memory of something you see and want to digitally capture, this is the camera for you. But you need to understand how to use a camera to get the best from it. I fear that this camera will never be understood by many.
But with continued development, the Sigma technology can represent tomorrow world. It really depends on how deep Sigma’s pockets are. To be honest, if I was Canon, I would take over Sigma, because their technology represents a serious threat.
June 16th, 2010 at 6:19 am
The DP1s is selling now in Germany for € 180 – € 190 Euros ($ 220-$250). I am delighted with the image quality! Panasonic TZ5 images look like crap against DP1s ones!
June 19th, 2010 at 7:49 am
Where is selling for this price? can you name the store. I have a friend of mine going to Germany…thanks…
June 26th, 2010 at 2:15 am
Dear Peter:
I am interested in the DP1s. Will you please let me know where I can purchase one for 180-190 euros? Thanks!
August 4th, 2010 at 1:57 pm
Yes, I have the dp2 now for about 2 months and am enjoying it more than probably any camera i’ve had previously. This would include everything from large format to compact digital. The image is intriguing and somewhat mysterious as to why it appears so brilliant. My best guess, based on hours of study as to it’s workings, is that the foveon sharpness at the pixel level is outstanding leading to an overall appearance of brilliance in the shadows through the highlight tones. This is repeatedly described as the 3D effect. Apparently not all viewers are able to see and/or appreciate this quality as I have read from various reviewers, though most acknowledge the phenomena. On the other hand, foveon images lack the subtlety of modern high resolution sensors which seem more analog in the sense of smoother tonal and color gradations. The foveon image could be described as the ultimate “digital” image with it’s overstated presentation of color and clarity, something not akin to conventional films. To many this digital look will not be esthetically pleasing and would therefore make a foveon camera a non viable option as a main imaging tool. To my eye the foveon image is exciting , honest, open and a definite blast of an image. I am considering either the dp1 or dp1s as a second camera to be carried with the dp2 thus allowing for wide angle as well as normal imaging . Best of both worlds. And as a side note, I uprezzed a dp2 image to 16×24 at 240 dpi as well as a similar shot from a 14meg Nex5 image, both downloaded from the internet. The shots were of the same subject, but from different angles and with different lighting. The similarity between the 2 shots was enough to compare. Same res. same size. I was astounded to find the sigma image just about equal to the 14 meg Sony image in terms of resolution. the Sony was slightly more detailed. But in the final analysis, for me anyway, the foveon isn’t about resolution , it’s about that magical quality of the foveon image.
August 18th, 2010 at 9:06 am
a reply to Jonas at the top here, who wrote:
“the review itself is great, and the camera sounds really nice – but it’s almost two years old!?”
So, people didn’t take good pictures two years ago, or what?
Leave a Reply