Comments on: Professional Fashion Photo Results with an iPhone 3gs

By: anonymus

anonymus — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:49:08 +0000

Try using E-5 + 14-35 F2.0 or 35-100 F2.0 before saying anything about Olympus SLR.
They are really outdated by Canikon and even sony models, but they sure produce damn good results.
Although i shoot Canon 1 Series, i still do have a lot of respect for Olympus SLR’s. Too bad they got shit corporate leaders.

By: anonymus

anonymus — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:45:40 +0000

WHAT THE FCUK?
I STILL SHOOT OLYMPUS DICKHEAD

By: jenny

jenny — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:45:50 +0000

You are an insult to all professional photographers. You want to fool all the pro photographers around the world with your sh*t and with your stupidity by making this trash video. You just created hatred with your foolishness.

By: Hayley

Hayley — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 06:14:30 +0000

Entertaining and intersting (definitely made me smile) but did miss their own set up point a little. If somebody had shown me this saying “Look they’re going to shoot an enitre fashion shoot on an iPhone” then I would have thought this was the best thing ever, no questions asked. But because I was told I was going to get taught how to shoot a fashion shoot without thousands of dollars worth of equipment, I was kind of sat there looking at the lighting and the make-up and the model and the retouching and thinking “Erm, hang on…..”.

By: Caroline Barth

Caroline Barth — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:27:25 +0000

Why can’t you people just enjoy this little experiment and not be so critical?

By: dukydaf

dukydaf — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:47:02 +0000

Ok, so the question is why is this video on DPS ? I am here to enrich my skills with a PHOTO-camera, and from all your little polls we learn that you have many DSLR owners on this site.
I agree that a phone will take good shots in good conditions, but take it in low-light, low-contrast situation and see what you get.
I didn’t see any of the sports photographers taking shots with a phone at a football game. They don’t need the equipment, right ?

As for me, I was forced to take photographs with my phone and p-s camera. And though the photo was there I did not have the tools to capture like I wanted. If I got one good shot I still would have to spend a good deal of time in photoshop.

By: Mikel Daniel

Mikel Daniel — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:41:30 +0000

You’re absolutely right…I don’t need the latest camera body…I need several thousands of dollars in lighting equipment! Fact of the matter of the matter is, while you’re limited only by your own creativity in envisioning great images, capturing those images WILL require a certain level of expenditure.

By: TwitchingEye

TwitchingEye — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:45:45 +0000

As they say… “it’s not the camera, it’s whose behind the camera”

By: Aaron

Aaron — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:00:12 +0000

I agree that its the person holding the camera, but I also agree that its the equiptment. Only with both combined together can photos with that WOW factor trully happen. A crap vision with the most expensive equiptment money can buy will not produce that amazing photo that people stare at lost for words. Just as a brilliant vision with rubbish, cheap equiptment will also not succede.

By: Karen

Karen — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:57:55 +0000

I appreciate the point the photographer was trying to make, but I think this old article from DPS made the point much better:

10 Cameraphone Photographs that Rock
http://digital-photography-school.com/10-cameraphone-photographs-that-rock

The images from the above DPS article demonstrated that you not only don’t need a DSLR to take great photos, but that you don’t need ANY expensive equipment. Each of these images relied purely on the skill and creativity of the photographer.