<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-109056</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 20:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-109056</guid>
		<description>I bought this cam last fall. $450 cdn. ouch. but I wanted a cam that I can take swimming and to the beach.  I also wanted a small cam for shot trips to the store and such.  My D90 is far too bulky for trips like that and I always worried about having it stolen.  I&#039;m really looking forward to getting in the water with it and not worrying about sand at the beach this summer.  As far as the image quality is concerned, it&#039;s no DSLR but does the job. After all, it&#039;s the 12 inched behind the cam that makes or breaks the shot.  

I tried it a few times this spring underwater and it has superior image quality.  I also tried it in my kitchen sink playing around with bubbles. Did an excellent job. Here&#039;s one of the shots from the sink. Not the greatest, it&#039;s hard to hold the duck underwater and handle a cam at the same time.


[eimg link=&#039;http://www.flickr.com/photos/shutterbug83photos/4604977594/&#039; title=&#039;underwater&#039; url=&#039;http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1324/4604977594_c07ac8ca83.jpg&#039;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this cam last fall. $450 cdn. ouch. but I wanted a cam that I can take swimming and to the beach.  I also wanted a small cam for shot trips to the store and such.  My D90 is far too bulky for trips like that and I always worried about having it stolen.  I&#8217;m really looking forward to getting in the water with it and not worrying about sand at the beach this summer.  As far as the image quality is concerned, it&#8217;s no DSLR but does the job. After all, it&#8217;s the 12 inched behind the cam that makes or breaks the shot.  </p>
<p>I tried it a few times this spring underwater and it has superior image quality.  I also tried it in my kitchen sink playing around with bubbles. Did an excellent job. Here&#8217;s one of the shots from the sink. Not the greatest, it&#8217;s hard to hold the duck underwater and handle a cam at the same time.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.flickr.com/photos/shutterbug83photos/4604977594/'><img src='http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1324/4604977594_c07ac8ca83.jpg' title='underwater' /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-105782</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-105782</guid>
		<description>I tested this camera and the Canon D10 when they were released last summer.  One of the things I did like about this camera was it&#039;s super macro function.  However, the image quality was mediocre to say the least.  I tested it and the D10 underwater, the D10 also came out on top.  The one concession I have to make is the HD video on the TS1 is a step up from SD video the D10 is limited too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested this camera and the Canon D10 when they were released last summer.  One of the things I did like about this camera was it&#8217;s super macro function.  However, the image quality was mediocre to say the least.  I tested it and the D10 underwater, the D10 also came out on top.  The one concession I have to make is the HD video on the TS1 is a step up from SD video the D10 is limited too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digital</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-53362</link>
		<dc:creator>digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-53362</guid>
		<description>High Definition (HD) video recording is good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High Definition (HD) video recording is good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlaBlaBla</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-46964</link>
		<dc:creator>BlaBlaBla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-46964</guid>
		<description>Maybe becouse of the PAL and NTSC differences... but don&#039;t really know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe becouse of the PAL and NTSC differences&#8230; but don&#8217;t really know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-46442</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-46442</guid>
		<description>Apologies, in the UK a DMC-FT1, USA A DMC-TS1. I have no idea why they would have different model names for the same device</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies, in the UK a DMC-FT1, USA A DMC-TS1. I have no idea why they would have different model names for the same device</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-46440</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-46440</guid>
		<description>Now called a DMC-FT1 according to Panasonic&#039;s website

http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/LUMIX+Digital+Cameras/Stylish+Compact/DMC-FT1/Overview/2033765/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now called a DMC-FT1 according to Panasonic&#8217;s website</p>
<p><a href="http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/LUMIX+Digital+Cameras/Stylish+Compact/DMC-FT1/Overview/2033765/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/LUMIX+Digital+Cameras/Stylish+Compact/DMC-FT1/Overview/2033765/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlaBlaBla</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-44028</link>
		<dc:creator>BlaBlaBla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 03:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-44028</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know where it is possible to buy one or where it will be avaible soon? I go to thailand in middle march and have to habe it before!!! Pls help!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know where it is possible to buy one or where it will be avaible soon? I go to thailand in middle march and have to habe it before!!! Pls help!  <img src='http://www.digital-photography-school.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Giunta</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-43164</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Giunta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-43164</guid>
		<description>Underwater?  Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underwater?  Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-43106</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-43106</guid>
		<description>It needs a scene mode for fish recognition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It needs a scene mode for fish recognition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slava33</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ts1/comment-page-1#comment-43062</link>
		<dc:creator>Slava33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3826#comment-43062</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used Olympus 790SW when in weather or skiing, but the IQ leaves a lot to be desired.  Also no manual modes and no image stabilization.  Hoping this Lumix will do better, but IQ is usually sacrificed in weatherproof cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Olympus 790SW when in weather or skiing, but the IQ leaves a lot to be desired.  Also no manual modes and no image stabilization.  Hoping this Lumix will do better, but IQ is usually sacrificed in weatherproof cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/21 queries in 0.106 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 449/457 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-14 12:35:56 -->
