<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overcoming Depth of Field Problems in Portraits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul webb</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-145083</link>
		<dc:creator>paul webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-145083</guid>
		<description>I found the article very useful. I do some nightclub work, which is mainly portraits although I do some dancefloor crowd shots as well. I love to use F1/4 for portraits and normally get the full face in focus although sometimes other areas may be slightly blurred, like a girl,s necklace for example, this can look quite nice. 
The problems start when  you photograph a group of people who are not all the same distance from the camera. It may look ok in the viewfinder but I when see the photo on the club,s facebook page I can see it,s slightly off.  Normally I go up to 2/8 or 3/5 for group shots but sometimes simply forget to do so in the hustle and bustle of a club. I put the occasional one on flickr but mostly I just leave them to the club to put on thier facebook page. I have a sony a550, 50 mm 1/4 and a f42am flash gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the article very useful. I do some nightclub work, which is mainly portraits although I do some dancefloor crowd shots as well. I love to use F1/4 for portraits and normally get the full face in focus although sometimes other areas may be slightly blurred, like a girl,s necklace for example, this can look quite nice.<br />
The problems start when  you photograph a group of people who are not all the same distance from the camera. It may look ok in the viewfinder but I when see the photo on the club,s facebook page I can see it,s slightly off.  Normally I go up to 2/8 or 3/5 for group shots but sometimes simply forget to do so in the hustle and bustle of a club. I put the occasional one on flickr but mostly I just leave them to the club to put on thier facebook page. I have a sony a550, 50 mm 1/4 and a f42am flash gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Minick</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-106925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Minick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-106925</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a DoFcalculator that I use. Very helpful.
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a DoFcalculator that I use. Very helpful.<br />
<a href="http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth anne Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-106442</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth anne Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-106442</guid>
		<description>The comments made on this site are typically very helpful and not critical or ugly to posters.  I really appreciate this.  This is a nice group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments made on this site are typically very helpful and not critical or ugly to posters.  I really appreciate this.  This is a nice group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-63089</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-63089</guid>
		<description>What lens are you using on the Sony Alpha 700?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What lens are you using on the Sony Alpha 700?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-63088</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-63088</guid>
		<description>I am all for shooting wide open. I heavily use my nikon 50mm 1.4. But in portrait shoot you add to subjects in varying distances shooting wide open and someone&#039;s gonna get the fuzz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for shooting wide open. I heavily use my nikon 50mm 1.4. But in portrait shoot you add to subjects in varying distances shooting wide open and someone&#8217;s gonna get the fuzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-45028</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-45028</guid>
		<description>Dept of field????? are there any suggestion with an Sony Alpha 700</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dept of field????? are there any suggestion with an Sony Alpha 700</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-17766</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-17766</guid>
		<description>Hello,

The comments were very helpful!  I am a photographer and have a Cannon D60--those suggestions will help me as a shoot a wedding in December!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>The comments were very helpful!  I am a photographer and have a Cannon D60&#8211;those suggestions will help me as a shoot a wedding in December!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shroticg</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-15425</link>
		<dc:creator>shroticg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-15425</guid>
		<description>u can experiment with any lens but for portraiture closeups the correct lens is 85mm to 135mm which gives sufficient distance and taking at the aperture of f8 focusing on the eyes is the best way to get good portrait shot, otherwise it can be taken upto bust and then crop for face. as suggested above ISO increase may also be a solution to decrease DOF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u can experiment with any lens but for portraiture closeups the correct lens is 85mm to 135mm which gives sufficient distance and taking at the aperture of f8 focusing on the eyes is the best way to get good portrait shot, otherwise it can be taken upto bust and then crop for face. as suggested above ISO increase may also be a solution to decrease DOF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearl Racette</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-15168</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl Racette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-15168</guid>
		<description>thanks for all the replies on this simple issue - 

I need a DOF problem HELP with ... to anyone who successfully shoots generational portraits or weddings with large groups....
I have an issue that I have been running into whenever I shoot larger groups - doing lots of generational portraits lately - last 2 with 19 or more people/kids - need a good DOF to insure all clients from front row to 4th row is in focus.   
I try to shoot at f16 to f22 but have to slow down my shutter speed to 1/30 or at times 1/15th when shooting in the open shade (to prevent squinting).  This creates an issue of blur if the client moves even a little ... so what is the answer.????.. tried to add flash and was able to bring SS up to 1/60th but still felt some blur at times...and would prefer not to be on a tripod to allow more creativity and movement.  what&#039;s the answer to large groups????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for all the replies on this simple issue &#8211; </p>
<p>I need a DOF problem HELP with &#8230; to anyone who successfully shoots generational portraits or weddings with large groups&#8230;.<br />
I have an issue that I have been running into whenever I shoot larger groups &#8211; doing lots of generational portraits lately &#8211; last 2 with 19 or more people/kids &#8211; need a good DOF to insure all clients from front row to 4th row is in focus.<br />
I try to shoot at f16 to f22 but have to slow down my shutter speed to 1/30 or at times 1/15th when shooting in the open shade (to prevent squinting).  This creates an issue of blur if the client moves even a little &#8230; so what is the answer.????.. tried to add flash and was able to bring SS up to 1/60th but still felt some blur at times&#8230;and would prefer not to be on a tripod to allow more creativity and movement.  what&#8217;s the answer to large groups????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Adam AIIP, AIMBI</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/comment-page-1#comment-15065</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Adam AIIP, AIMBI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/overcoming-depth-of-field-problems-in-portraits/#comment-15065</guid>
		<description>A 50mm lens is far from ideal for portraiture, you really require a 85mm lens if using film, this has been proved as ideal over the ages. Lighting is ofcourse very important, you want a main light, a fill in light or a strong reflector to lighten the shadow, a rim light in certain conditions and a background light. The main light must be strong enough to enable you to select an aperture that will get the subject in focus and the background less sharp. You may want the background totally out of Focus. I started on a half plate Gandolfi Camera in 1962 and now use a Nikon D100, I have a selection of lenses I use about 120mm for portraits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 50mm lens is far from ideal for portraiture, you really require a 85mm lens if using film, this has been proved as ideal over the ages. Lighting is ofcourse very important, you want a main light, a fill in light or a strong reflector to lighten the shadow, a rim light in certain conditions and a background light. The main light must be strong enough to enable you to select an aperture that will get the subject in focus and the background less sharp. You may want the background totally out of Focus. I started on a half plate Gandolfi Camera in 1962 and now use a Nikon D100, I have a selection of lenses I use about 120mm for portraits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.121 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 449/456 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-15 01:30:03 -->
