<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac or PC for Post Production Processing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-215927</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-215927</guid>
		<description>I was using a PC Laptop w/64 bit Windows Vista Pro 4GB mem.  All my photo editing apps crashed  constantly, so 1.5 years ago, I switched to a Macbook pro (2.66Ghz, i7 w/4GB of RAM) and have never looked back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using a PC Laptop w/64 bit Windows Vista Pro 4GB mem.  All my photo editing apps crashed  constantly, so 1.5 years ago, I switched to a Macbook pro (2.66Ghz, i7 w/4GB of RAM) and have never looked back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixieboy</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-214080</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixieboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-214080</guid>
		<description>I use a 27&quot; iMac. Split screen capable makes adjusting a snap. iPhoto software is simple and very poweful and allows me to save my masters untouched. I save all my .raw files to .tiff when finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a 27&#8243; iMac. Split screen capable makes adjusting a snap. iPhoto software is simple and very poweful and allows me to save my masters untouched. I save all my .raw files to .tiff when finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Fragos</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-213733</link>
		<dc:creator>George Fragos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 21:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-213733</guid>
		<description>I use a PC running Ubuntu. PC doesn&#039;t mean Windows despite what Microsoft would like us to think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a PC running Ubuntu. PC doesn&#8217;t mean Windows despite what Microsoft would like us to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ziff</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-66673</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ziff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-66673</guid>
		<description>I use a 20 inch iMac. I&#039;m a professional photographer in Clearwater FL and my photographer friends all use a mac without exception for post production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a 20 inch iMac. I&#8217;m a professional photographer in Clearwater FL and my photographer friends all use a mac without exception for post production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-42635</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-42635</guid>
		<description>I have the recent model 15&quot; MacBook Pro and the 24&quot; LED Apple cinema display that I use in combination with Apple&#039;s Aperture. I also use the ColorEFXPro plug-in for Aperture, as well as the included Dodge and burn plug-in. I rarely use Photoshop anymore...no real need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the recent model 15&#8243; MacBook Pro and the 24&#8243; LED Apple cinema display that I use in combination with Apple&#8217;s Aperture. I also use the ColorEFXPro plug-in for Aperture, as well as the included Dodge and burn plug-in. I rarely use Photoshop anymore&#8230;no real need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Bartle</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-42613</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Bartle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-42613</guid>
		<description>Mac G4 with Aperture.  I also have Canvas X (no longer made for mac) and this software has some cute effect editing features.   But in the main, Aperture gives me all the right answers.  Seldom use iphoto. 
I gave up on PC&#039;s about 3 years ago and have not needed a computer technician or crash counselling ever since!  And I&#039;m so happy about that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac G4 with Aperture.  I also have Canvas X (no longer made for mac) and this software has some cute effect editing features.   But in the main, Aperture gives me all the right answers.  Seldom use iphoto.<br />
I gave up on PC&#8217;s about 3 years ago and have not needed a computer technician or crash counselling ever since!  And I&#8217;m so happy about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter G.</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-42451</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-42451</guid>
		<description>Many, many years ago I started with a PC. Little over a year a go my best friend finally talked me in to a Power Mac with OS X. I am only sorry I did not change a decade a go!!!!!! I love my Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many, many years ago I started with a PC. Little over a year a go my best friend finally talked me in to a Power Mac with OS X. I am only sorry I did not change a decade a go!!!!!! I love my Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-38810</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-38810</guid>
		<description>So far not one person, article, book ... and I have searched on forever, can truly tell me what the MAC has that the PC doesn&#039;t. 

Ease of use? Graphics? It&#039;s not really true.  I have used a pc for practically my whole adult life, it&#039;s easy.

Graphics? I don&#039;t create comic books ... I take pictures with a camera.  Photoshop works well on a PC, and shows up great and accurate on my hp (calibrated, gotta remember to calibrate for the correct results) screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far not one person, article, book &#8230; and I have searched on forever, can truly tell me what the MAC has that the PC doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Ease of use? Graphics? It&#8217;s not really true.  I have used a pc for practically my whole adult life, it&#8217;s easy.</p>
<p>Graphics? I don&#8217;t create comic books &#8230; I take pictures with a camera.  Photoshop works well on a PC, and shows up great and accurate on my hp (calibrated, gotta remember to calibrate for the correct results) screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-38809</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-38809</guid>
		<description>I use a PC.  I am a big believer that as far as photography is concerned it all begins with your camera.  If your photo is exposed correctly, white balance is correct, ... you are going to be able to develop a good print.  Now as far as post processing I use photoshop and have a hp computer, epson printing ... all good / high end stuff ... i am very more than happy with my results.  When considering the switch, especialy when purchasing my hp, I read and compared, when all was said everything matched up exactly the same, except that pc&#039;s were compatible with every one of my clients, and I could also use at home as a secondary computer (as I don&#039;t have disposable income) It was really a no brainer for a freelance photographer who really only uses the computer for minimal post production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a PC.  I am a big believer that as far as photography is concerned it all begins with your camera.  If your photo is exposed correctly, white balance is correct, &#8230; you are going to be able to develop a good print.  Now as far as post processing I use photoshop and have a hp computer, epson printing &#8230; all good / high end stuff &#8230; i am very more than happy with my results.  When considering the switch, especialy when purchasing my hp, I read and compared, when all was said everything matched up exactly the same, except that pc&#8217;s were compatible with every one of my clients, and I could also use at home as a secondary computer (as I don&#8217;t have disposable income) It was really a no brainer for a freelance photographer who really only uses the computer for minimal post production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/comment-page-3#comment-19358</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/mac-or-pc-for-post-production-processing/#comment-19358</guid>
		<description>Been a PC guy since PC&#039;s been. I keep thinking of a MAC but I&#039;m not sure if you can teach this old dog any new tricks.  Think I&#039;ll just leave well enough alone.  Im quite satisfied with my high end Dell, 24&quot; LCD, Photoshop Lightroom and Elements 5.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been a PC guy since PC&#8217;s been. I keep thinking of a MAC but I&#8217;m not sure if you can teach this old dog any new tricks.  Think I&#8217;ll just leave well enough alone.  Im quite satisfied with my high end Dell, 24&#8243; LCD, Photoshop Lightroom and Elements 5.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.068 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 439/447 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-14 20:45:33 -->
