<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 3 Print Improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonya</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-204679</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-204679</guid>
		<description>Help.....Lightroom 3 will not allow me to &#039;drag and drop&#039; a photo into the Custom Photo Package in the Print Module.  I used to be able to do that and now I don&#039;t know what I&#039;m doing wrong.  When I try to drag the photo, nothing happens.  :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help&#8230;..Lightroom 3 will not allow me to &#8216;drag and drop&#8217; a photo into the Custom Photo Package in the Print Module.  I used to be able to do that and now I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m doing wrong.  When I try to drag the photo, nothing happens.  :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malinda julien</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-117086</link>
		<dc:creator>malinda julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-117086</guid>
		<description>other than print module improvement, what else is there to make me want to buy this? I use LR2 first, fix everything I want to fix or adjust and then export to CS5 to take care of any other adjustments.  I don&#039;t print - I use a lab, so that is just not impressive enough for me to change....

So, what else is the upgrade offering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>other than print module improvement, what else is there to make me want to buy this? I use LR2 first, fix everything I want to fix or adjust and then export to CS5 to take care of any other adjustments.  I don&#8217;t print &#8211; I use a lab, so that is just not impressive enough for me to change&#8230;.</p>
<p>So, what else is the upgrade offering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-79328</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-79328</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this tip!!! &lt;cite&gt;hold the Control key (Command on the Mac) and drag the image inside the container to find the best position for it.&lt;/cite&gt;

Also, to compose and print a &quot;Seamless Image&quot; (print to image) - I find that I am unable to do this with my Page Setup configured for my HP printer - because it&#039;s unable to print seamlessly to the edges. The solution?

Install Cute PDF! I select &quot;Cute PDFWriter&quot; as my printer output and now I can compose seamless 8x10 shots!
http://www.cutepdf.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this tip!!! <cite>hold the Control key (Command on the Mac) and drag the image inside the container to find the best position for it.</cite></p>
<p>Also, to compose and print a &#8220;Seamless Image&#8221; (print to image) &#8211; I find that I am unable to do this with my Page Setup configured for my HP printer &#8211; because it&#8217;s unable to print seamlessly to the edges. The solution?</p>
<p>Install Cute PDF! I select &#8220;Cute PDFWriter&#8221; as my printer output and now I can compose seamless 8&#215;10 shots!<br />
<a href="http://www.cutepdf.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cutepdf.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-77047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-77047</guid>
		<description>Oh nevermind!  I finally found the answer to that in the release notes.  (Of course I find it after I posted my question here, lol) They can both be used without interference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh nevermind!  I finally found the answer to that in the release notes.  (Of course I find it after I posted my question here, lol) They can both be used without interference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-77043</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-77043</guid>
		<description>Can I install Lightroom 3 Beta without it interfering with Lightroom 2?  I&#039;d like to check it out but just want to make sure they are both stand-alone and I won&#039;t have any problems using Lightroom 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I install Lightroom 3 Beta without it interfering with Lightroom 2?  I&#8217;d like to check it out but just want to make sure they are both stand-alone and I won&#8217;t have any problems using Lightroom 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ziegler</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-76025</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ziegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-76025</guid>
		<description>Neet addition Helen. I wouldn&#039;t have seen this if you hadn&#039;t written the article. 
I tried placing 5 images on a  8 x 10 sheet with a gray background which worked as advertised. However, it took  a long time (3-4 minutes) to render the image. I hope Adobe can speed this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neet addition Helen. I wouldn&#8217;t have seen this if you hadn&#8217;t written the article.<br />
I tried placing 5 images on a  8 x 10 sheet with a gray background which worked as advertised. However, it took  a long time (3-4 minutes) to render the image. I hope Adobe can speed this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-76014</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-76014</guid>
		<description>@Dawn, I am with you there. 

I think sometimes upgrades have what I call &quot;deal makers&quot; which are improvements that are, of themselves, enough to justify upgrading and for me this is one of them.

There really hasn&#039;t been a leading photoediting program since Jasc/Corel PaintShop pro which has offered this much control over printing. PaintShop Pro still has strengths in printing, even when weighted up against Lightroom 3, but this new feature in Lightroom is, to my mind, a feature which will make it a must have upgrade for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dawn, I am with you there. </p>
<p>I think sometimes upgrades have what I call &#8220;deal makers&#8221; which are improvements that are, of themselves, enough to justify upgrading and for me this is one of them.</p>
<p>There really hasn&#8217;t been a leading photoediting program since Jasc/Corel PaintShop pro which has offered this much control over printing. PaintShop Pro still has strengths in printing, even when weighted up against Lightroom 3, but this new feature in Lightroom is, to my mind, a feature which will make it a must have upgrade for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-76013</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-76013</guid>
		<description>Helen,
Thanks for the article.  Being just a hobbyist photographer with limited time I have enough on my plate keeping up with LR2, but this added printing feature will definitely be an important item that I will appreciate when the final version comes out and will likely cause me to buy the upgrade sooner then later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen,<br />
Thanks for the article.  Being just a hobbyist photographer with limited time I have enough on my plate keeping up with LR2, but this added printing feature will definitely be an important item that I will appreciate when the final version comes out and will likely cause me to buy the upgrade sooner then later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behzad Zamanian</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-74897</link>
		<dc:creator>Behzad Zamanian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-74897</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/lightroom-3-print-improvements/comment-page-1#comment-74893</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=10021#comment-74893</guid>
		<description>@ Behzad: 

I&#039;ve not tried LR 3beta, but: 

In v2, when you imported, you specified the location of the original files. Usually, you&#039;d import them to your computer&#039;s hard disk (this is what I do.) There is an option you can check to backup the original files on import. It makes the most sense to back them up to an external hard drive, in case the computer crashes (this is what I do.) Backing up the catalog is a completely different thing, yet just as important. As Lightroom does not actually modify your original photos, your edits and keywords and such are saved in the catalog. LR defaults the catalog backup to somewhere on your hard disk. But this doesn&#039;t make sense, as you&#039;d have two copies of what could be a large file, and if your computer crashes, then you&#039;ve still lost your catalog. I recommend backing up the catalog as well to an external (which I do daily). That way, if your computer crashes, you open up LR, and if you need to, copy the most recent backed up catalog over, have LR open that, and if any photos are missing, you can copy them over from the external, and you should be up and running. 

Does this help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Behzad: </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not tried LR 3beta, but: </p>
<p>In v2, when you imported, you specified the location of the original files. Usually, you&#8217;d import them to your computer&#8217;s hard disk (this is what I do.) There is an option you can check to backup the original files on import. It makes the most sense to back them up to an external hard drive, in case the computer crashes (this is what I do.) Backing up the catalog is a completely different thing, yet just as important. As Lightroom does not actually modify your original photos, your edits and keywords and such are saved in the catalog. LR defaults the catalog backup to somewhere on your hard disk. But this doesn&#8217;t make sense, as you&#8217;d have two copies of what could be a large file, and if your computer crashes, then you&#8217;ve still lost your catalog. I recommend backing up the catalog as well to an external (which I do daily). That way, if your computer crashes, you open up LR, and if you need to, copy the most recent backed up catalog over, have LR open that, and if any photos are missing, you can copy them over from the external, and you should be up and running. </p>
<p>Does this help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/15 queries in 0.063 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 441/443 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-14 16:00:28 -->
