<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Get Shallow Depth of Field in Your Digital Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard "Rick" Ohman</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-248002</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard "Rick" Ohman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-248002</guid>
		<description>Being a professional photographer does not mean I cannot use ocassional mentoring once in awhile. I find this site extremely valuable for any photographer and shall contribute my own &quot;blogs&quot; on occassion or if asked for advice
Richard &quot;Rick&quot; Ohman
rick.ohman@yahoo.com
San Ramon Alajuela
Costa Rica
www.wix.com/quicksilverstudiosco/quicksilverstudioscr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a professional photographer does not mean I cannot use ocassional mentoring once in awhile. I find this site extremely valuable for any photographer and shall contribute my own &#8220;blogs&#8221; on occassion or if asked for advice<br />
Richard &#8220;Rick&#8221; Ohman<br />
<a href="mailto:rick.ohman@yahoo.com">rick.ohman@yahoo.com</a><br />
San Ramon Alajuela<br />
Costa Rica<br />
<a href="http://www.wix.com/quicksilverstudiosco/quicksilverstudioscr" rel="nofollow">http://www.wix.com/quicksilverstudiosco/quicksilverstudioscr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Cherch</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-219592</link>
		<dc:creator>A Cherch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-219592</guid>
		<description>more importantly, i have the 20 d, with a 17-85 mm lens, would that suffice in-order to get a shallow depth of field?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more importantly, i have the 20 d, with a 17-85 mm lens, would that suffice in-order to get a shallow depth of field?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Cherch</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-219591</link>
		<dc:creator>A Cherch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-219591</guid>
		<description>Photonoob, every heard of the iphone? it lets u go online, even when our not @ home....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photonoob, every heard of the iphone? it lets u go online, even when our not @ home&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohit</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-211888</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 09:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-211888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that the DOF is thinner for the fastest aperture (f/5.6) at 55mm than it is at the fastest aperture (f/3.5) at 18mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that the DOF is thinner for the fastest aperture (f/5.6) at 55mm than it is at the fastest aperture (f/3.5) at 18mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-208720</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-208720</guid>
		<description>Also have a bower fisheye 0.16x 58mm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also have a bower fisheye 0.16x 58mm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-208719</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-208719</guid>
		<description>Just bought a cannon 7d and was going to take a photography class but I broke my kneecap in three pieces. What settings should I use for shallow depth of field.  I have a 28-135,a 70-300is 1:4-5.6 and a 70-200mm 1:2.8 L and on the first one a macro 0.5m/1.6ft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just bought a cannon 7d and was going to take a photography class but I broke my kneecap in three pieces. What settings should I use for shallow depth of field.  I have a 28-135,a 70-300is 1:4-5.6 and a 70-200mm 1:2.8 L and on the first one a macro 0.5m/1.6ft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-200975</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-200975</guid>
		<description>Denise,

It sounds like you are going the wrong direction in Aperture priority. You will want to get it down to f2.8, f3.5 or the smallest number available for your lens. If the shutter is staying open too long then most likely you went the opposite direction &quot;smaller opening&quot; F11, F16 etc

Do yourself a favor and buy the relatively inexpensive 50mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.4 if you have a little more to spend.  
With these lenses depth of field &quot;Blurry background&quot; is a given since you will be shooting at f1.8 and these lenses are very fast even in low light. This should be your second lens after the kit lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise,</p>
<p>It sounds like you are going the wrong direction in Aperture priority. You will want to get it down to f2.8, f3.5 or the smallest number available for your lens. If the shutter is staying open too long then most likely you went the opposite direction &#8220;smaller opening&#8221; F11, F16 etc</p>
<p>Do yourself a favor and buy the relatively inexpensive 50mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.4 if you have a little more to spend.<br />
With these lenses depth of field &#8220;Blurry background&#8221; is a given since you will be shooting at f1.8 and these lenses are very fast even in low light. This should be your second lens after the kit lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-200974</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-200974</guid>
		<description>Denise,

It sounds like you are going the wrong direction in Aperture priority. You will want to get it down to f2.8, f3.5 or the smallest number available for your lens. If the shutter is staying open too long then most likely you went the opposite direction &quot;smaller opening&quot; F11, F16 etc

Do yourself a favor and buy the relatively inexpensive 50mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.4 if you have a little more to spend.  
With these lenses depth of field &quot;Blurry background&quot; is a given since you will be shooting at f1.8 and these lenses are very fast even in low light. This should be your second lens after the kit lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise,</p>
<p>It sounds like you are going the wrong direction in Aperture priority. You will want to get it down to f2.8, f3.5 or the smallest number available for your lens. If the shutter is staying open too long then most likely you went the opposite direction &#8220;smaller opening&#8221; F11, F16 etc</p>
<p>Do yourself a favor and buy the relatively inexpensive 50mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.4 if you have a little more to spend.<br />
With these lenses depth of field &#8220;Blurry background&#8221; is a given since you will be shooting at f1.8 and these lenses are very fast even in low light. This should be your second lens after the kit lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-200721</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-200721</guid>
		<description>I have a sony alpha 330 and I normally use the portrait setting if I wanna make the background blur.  However I don&#039;t get the effect as much as what is shown in the picture above.  I tried messing with the Aperture Setting but I come to find that when I click the shutter button it&#039;ll take a while to process the picture and everything in my picture will be blurred.  I&#039;m still learning how to use this camera so any info would be great!  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a sony alpha 330 and I normally use the portrait setting if I wanna make the background blur.  However I don&#8217;t get the effect as much as what is shown in the picture above.  I tried messing with the Aperture Setting but I come to find that when I click the shutter button it&#8217;ll take a while to process the picture and everything in my picture will be blurred.  I&#8217;m still learning how to use this camera so any info would be great!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisa Loveday</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/comment-page-2#comment-193514</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa Loveday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-get-shallow-depth-of-field-in-your-digital-photos/#comment-193514</guid>
		<description>Thank you for explaining this in plain English. I have read about this concept so many times on different photography sites only to leave scratching my head and not quite feeling like I &quot;get&quot; it. Suddenly after reading this page, I had an a-ha moment! It finally made sense. Excellent post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for explaining this in plain English. I have read about this concept so many times on different photography sites only to leave scratching my head and not quite feeling like I &#8220;get&#8221; it. Suddenly after reading this page, I had an a-ha moment! It finally made sense. Excellent post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 14/15 queries in 0.005 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 441/443 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-15 03:36:33 -->
