<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Overexposed &#8220;Trash&#8221; to Pop-Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-50168</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-50168</guid>
		<description>This site is all about sharing ideas and learning from each other and this person was just trying to do their part. Show a little respect, guys.

While I do believe that some shots are worth saving if they captured a unique priceless moment, I agree that this method is probably not one I would use to correct my overexposed photos. One technique I have used in the past is to apply both a cutout effect and poster edges in order to give the image a cartoony look. One could argue that this is a fairly cliche effect as well but I guess it just depends on your audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is all about sharing ideas and learning from each other and this person was just trying to do their part. Show a little respect, guys.</p>
<p>While I do believe that some shots are worth saving if they captured a unique priceless moment, I agree that this method is probably not one I would use to correct my overexposed photos. One technique I have used in the past is to apply both a cutout effect and poster edges in order to give the image a cartoony look. One could argue that this is a fairly cliche effect as well but I guess it just depends on your audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shariq Siddiqui</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-47144</link>
		<dc:creator>Shariq Siddiqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-47144</guid>
		<description>The Warhol effect has been done to death. Just take a look at Facebook. There are ways of salvaging crap photos but in this case the subject&#039;s very pose doesn&#039;t work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Warhol effect has been done to death. Just take a look at Facebook. There are ways of salvaging crap photos but in this case the subject&#8217;s very pose doesn&#8217;t work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cavale</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-46280</link>
		<dc:creator>cavale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-46280</guid>
		<description>i think this article would be better titled &quot;From Overexposed &quot;Trash&quot; to Pop-Art Trash&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this article would be better titled &#8220;From Overexposed &#8220;Trash&#8221; to Pop-Art Trash&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mesa</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-46024</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-46024</guid>
		<description>In some ways it comes back to - if you did it by accident is it still art?  I mean some of the stuff you see in museums today could be created by a 2 year old.  But I think it&#039;s art because the artist did it on purpose.  Or maybe the art world just has its head up its arse.  

At any rate, I think a better candidate for rescuing a trash photo would have been a photo with too much grain and turning it b/w.  That has saved some of my photos.  Sometimes about grain in BW can be pleasing where it&#039;s just annoying in colour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some ways it comes back to &#8211; if you did it by accident is it still art?  I mean some of the stuff you see in museums today could be created by a 2 year old.  But I think it&#8217;s art because the artist did it on purpose.  Or maybe the art world just has its head up its arse.  </p>
<p>At any rate, I think a better candidate for rescuing a trash photo would have been a photo with too much grain and turning it b/w.  That has saved some of my photos.  Sometimes about grain in BW can be pleasing where it&#8217;s just annoying in colour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-45892</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence Zimmerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-45892</guid>
		<description>I think you have the right idea here. I think people are just looking at it wrong.

I have done some wonderful things with my crap photos. These can happen for many reasons. Right place right time wrong camera comes to mind often. I have taken some photos of BB King in a dark environment with my point and shoot and got some great composures but crappy exposures and some out of focus shots. I tweaked them the best I could using my photo software then brought them into painshop. I converted them to black and white and tweaked the white balance to make them look like some very old club photographs. I love them, some people do see them and think they are out of focus but others see the art for what they are art. I also took of of Lucile and tweaked it in color and used some &quot;painting conversion&quot; software and slightly converted it to look more like a piece of art. And it looks great even those that do not like the B&amp;W BB shots because they feel they are a tad out of focus they love that shot. And the original is out of focus as well.

So you can turn crap into art. 

Now my personal opinion of the image above is that it certainly is over exposed and I think that hurts it in this warholesk conversion. The bright areas in the color squares are equal in color to the background I think perhaps if this were adjusted and the original white background were changed to be slightly darker than the face area that this would take on a whole new look and would be much more appealing. The face area and the background area having the same balance hurts the image visually. Or maybe even if they were both balanced the same but started out darker in the first place; either way it would bring the final image to a whole new place. Yes it is white because of overexposure but perhaps just adjusting the color white some then make the other boxes. (I hope that makes sense?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have the right idea here. I think people are just looking at it wrong.</p>
<p>I have done some wonderful things with my crap photos. These can happen for many reasons. Right place right time wrong camera comes to mind often. I have taken some photos of BB King in a dark environment with my point and shoot and got some great composures but crappy exposures and some out of focus shots. I tweaked them the best I could using my photo software then brought them into painshop. I converted them to black and white and tweaked the white balance to make them look like some very old club photographs. I love them, some people do see them and think they are out of focus but others see the art for what they are art. I also took of of Lucile and tweaked it in color and used some &#8220;painting conversion&#8221; software and slightly converted it to look more like a piece of art. And it looks great even those that do not like the B&amp;W BB shots because they feel they are a tad out of focus they love that shot. And the original is out of focus as well.</p>
<p>So you can turn crap into art. </p>
<p>Now my personal opinion of the image above is that it certainly is over exposed and I think that hurts it in this warholesk conversion. The bright areas in the color squares are equal in color to the background I think perhaps if this were adjusted and the original white background were changed to be slightly darker than the face area that this would take on a whole new look and would be much more appealing. The face area and the background area having the same balance hurts the image visually. Or maybe even if they were both balanced the same but started out darker in the first place; either way it would bring the final image to a whole new place. Yes it is white because of overexposure but perhaps just adjusting the color white some then make the other boxes. (I hope that makes sense?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-45891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-45891</guid>
		<description>a poor imitation of something that was mediocre to begin with is not a valuable use of anyones time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a poor imitation of something that was mediocre to begin with is not a valuable use of anyones time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Kontur</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-45881</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Kontur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-45881</guid>
		<description>I want to thank everyone who has taken the time to comment. I mean that quite sincerely. I can accept that the whole concept of trying to make something of ruined photos isn&#039;t everyone&#039;s cup of tea. It isn&#039;t always mine either, though I believe it can be valuable to stretch your imagination once in a while.

Nonetheless, DPS tries to be loyal and responsive to its readers and to what they want. We tried to present something a little different. The fact that it didn&#039;t resonate with readers is neither good nor bad. It&#039;s simply useful feedback that will be taken and used to make DPS an even better place for serving the interests of the photographer community in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank everyone who has taken the time to comment. I mean that quite sincerely. I can accept that the whole concept of trying to make something of ruined photos isn&#8217;t everyone&#8217;s cup of tea. It isn&#8217;t always mine either, though I believe it can be valuable to stretch your imagination once in a while.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, DPS tries to be loyal and responsive to its readers and to what they want. We tried to present something a little different. The fact that it didn&#8217;t resonate with readers is neither good nor bad. It&#8217;s simply useful feedback that will be taken and used to make DPS an even better place for serving the interests of the photographer community in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bIG bEN</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-45873</link>
		<dc:creator>bIG bEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-45873</guid>
		<description>I always take badly exposed photos and use them to explore post production techniques that I normally wouldn&#039;t use. I can&#039;t say that i&#039;m doing the same stuff as in this tutorial, but I think it was designed to get your own creative juices flowing. I do&#039;nt have any great examples to show here, but i have done the same thing as Eugenio where i was distracted and didn&#039;t adjust my exposure when i thought the camera was on Priority mode: http://www.flickr.com/photos/benreece/2788635121/in/set-72157606905168481/ The results aren&#039;t fantastic, but it reminds me of the bright light and with a little cropping could be a nice photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always take badly exposed photos and use them to explore post production techniques that I normally wouldn&#8217;t use. I can&#8217;t say that i&#8217;m doing the same stuff as in this tutorial, but I think it was designed to get your own creative juices flowing. I do&#8217;nt have any great examples to show here, but i have done the same thing as Eugenio where i was distracted and didn&#8217;t adjust my exposure when i thought the camera was on Priority mode: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/benreece/2788635121/in/set-72157606905168481/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/benreece/2788635121/in/set-72157606905168481/</a> The results aren&#8217;t fantastic, but it reminds me of the bright light and with a little cropping could be a nice photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenio</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-45869</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugenio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-45869</guid>
		<description>Hi Anne, thank you!
The shot was 3 to 5 full stop overexposed. Shot in raw, of course.
I imported it with Adobe Camera Raw, lowering the &quot;Exposition&quot; to (around) one fifth of the range, playing with shadows and light values, and pushing the saturation values up to the limit of &quot;realistic&quot; colours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anne, thank you!<br />
The shot was 3 to 5 full stop overexposed. Shot in raw, of course.<br />
I imported it with Adobe Camera Raw, lowering the &#8220;Exposition&#8221; to (around) one fifth of the range, playing with shadows and light values, and pushing the saturation values up to the limit of &#8220;realistic&#8221; colours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasmincormier</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/from-overexposed-trash-to-pop-art/comment-page-1#comment-45861</link>
		<dc:creator>jasmincormier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=4507#comment-45861</guid>
		<description>Warhol was cool 40 years ago... Maybe try a less cliché effect now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warhol was cool 40 years ago&#8230; Maybe try a less cliché effect now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/17 queries in 0.046 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 439/447 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-14 18:06:33 -->
