<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capture One 4 Pro &#8211; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellowledbetter</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66434</link>
		<dc:creator>yellowledbetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66434</guid>
		<description>@ nathan

good thing it worked for you, that&#039;s how it should be.
i&#039;ve been puzzling to get it working and just gave up at a certain point.
then i found this program and it worked instantly for me.
in the end it&#039;s all about the result, everyone has got their tools to reach that goal.
give it a try, it has alot of cool features that the canon software doesn&#039;t have, i&#039;ll stick to lightroom for my post processing though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ nathan</p>
<p>good thing it worked for you, that&#8217;s how it should be.<br />
i&#8217;ve been puzzling to get it working and just gave up at a certain point.<br />
then i found this program and it worked instantly for me.<br />
in the end it&#8217;s all about the result, everyone has got their tools to reach that goal.<br />
give it a try, it has alot of cool features that the canon software doesn&#8217;t have, i&#8217;ll stick to lightroom for my post processing though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sime</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66377</link>
		<dc:creator>Sime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66377</guid>
		<description>@ S Simpson - This is a review of one product rather than a comparison to every tool available on the market. (But thank you for your input) Most pro fashion photogs that I spoke to used CaptureOne so that&#039;s what I asked Nathan (A pro fashion photographer mate of mine) to look at :-0) C1 is OK, BreezeBrowser is good.. Expression is coming along nicely... So many tools out there. 

Sime</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ S Simpson &#8211; This is a review of one product rather than a comparison to every tool available on the market. (But thank you for your input) Most pro fashion photogs that I spoke to used CaptureOne so that&#8217;s what I asked Nathan (A pro fashion photographer mate of mine) to look at :-0) C1 is OK, BreezeBrowser is good.. Expression is coming along nicely&#8230; So many tools out there. </p>
<p>Sime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reznor</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66360</link>
		<dc:creator>Reznor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66360</guid>
		<description>@Zack Jones

I&#039;ve used DSLR Remote Pro and it had problems keeping up. You shoot a photo and it takes like 1-2 seconds to send it to the PC. Guess, it just depends on what you&#039;re shooting as Nathan pointed out. 
It&#039;s kinda cool for self-portraits, cause you can do time lapse shots, meaning, you can have your camera shoot every 10 seconds (or whatever time setting you like) and see the photo on the PC display and adjust your position, pose, whatever. It also has some photo booth mode, but I haven&#039;t tried that, yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zack Jones</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used DSLR Remote Pro and it had problems keeping up. You shoot a photo and it takes like 1-2 seconds to send it to the PC. Guess, it just depends on what you&#8217;re shooting as Nathan pointed out.<br />
It&#8217;s kinda cool for self-portraits, cause you can do time lapse shots, meaning, you can have your camera shoot every 10 seconds (or whatever time setting you like) and see the photo on the PC display and adjust your position, pose, whatever. It also has some photo booth mode, but I haven&#8217;t tried that, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66357</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66357</guid>
		<description>I use the Canon software that came bundled with the camera when I&#039;ve done some tethered shooting... Worked like a charm for me, yellowledbetter... but, after reading the article, my curiosity has been piqued enough to where I&#039;m probably going to check this out!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the Canon software that came bundled with the camera when I&#8217;ve done some tethered shooting&#8230; Worked like a charm for me, yellowledbetter&#8230; but, after reading the article, my curiosity has been piqued enough to where I&#8217;m probably going to check this out!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66344</link>
		<dc:creator>S Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66344</guid>
		<description>I must say that it appears that there was not a great deal of research put into this article.  If  there was you should have mentioned that C1 works great Expression Media 2 which is a great keywording/cataloging system, far superior to Lightroom in my mind.  Also as far as tethering, there is a very good product in Breeze Systems DSLR remote for Canon or NKRemote for Nikon shooters.  It appears that Chris Breeze has finally released a mac version of DSLR for Canon&#039;s, one could surmise that the Nikon version might follow this.

I have used C1 as my primary RAW converter for years and do have Lightroom installed as well.  I will admit that it would be great if Phase One and Microsoft would get together on this one and build an integrated product but the two separately work very well and I can find any of my images in a heartbeat.  I gave Lightroom an honest try but I found once the catalog got to over 70K images it slowed way down to a crawl when searching for images.  Expression Media is lightning fast in searches.  I have found the RAW conversions that I produce from C1 vs Lightroom to be superior as well.  They do something in their sharpening algorithm that is just nicer than Adobe&#039;s.  

No doubt that Adobe makes a very fine product in Lightroom but in my opinion it is targeted at the prosumer market.  For those that are really very serious about their photography they should take a hard look at C1 and Expression Media.  I have used DSLR remote on many occasions and it works great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that it appears that there was not a great deal of research put into this article.  If  there was you should have mentioned that C1 works great Expression Media 2 which is a great keywording/cataloging system, far superior to Lightroom in my mind.  Also as far as tethering, there is a very good product in Breeze Systems DSLR remote for Canon or NKRemote for Nikon shooters.  It appears that Chris Breeze has finally released a mac version of DSLR for Canon&#8217;s, one could surmise that the Nikon version might follow this.</p>
<p>I have used C1 as my primary RAW converter for years and do have Lightroom installed as well.  I will admit that it would be great if Phase One and Microsoft would get together on this one and build an integrated product but the two separately work very well and I can find any of my images in a heartbeat.  I gave Lightroom an honest try but I found once the catalog got to over 70K images it slowed way down to a crawl when searching for images.  Expression Media is lightning fast in searches.  I have found the RAW conversions that I produce from C1 vs Lightroom to be superior as well.  They do something in their sharpening algorithm that is just nicer than Adobe&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>No doubt that Adobe makes a very fine product in Lightroom but in my opinion it is targeted at the prosumer market.  For those that are really very serious about their photography they should take a hard look at C1 and Expression Media.  I have used DSLR remote on many occasions and it works great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66332</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66332</guid>
		<description>I remember checking out this software in the past and it looked pretty good. Fortunately for me LightRoom meets all of my needs. It&#039;s too bad EOS Utility can&#039;t keep up with the camera. I wonder if a program such as DSLR Remote Pro from Breezesys (http://www.breezesys.com/DSLRRemotePro/index.htm) would keep up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember checking out this software in the past and it looked pretty good. Fortunately for me LightRoom meets all of my needs. It&#8217;s too bad EOS Utility can&#8217;t keep up with the camera. I wonder if a program such as DSLR Remote Pro from Breezesys (<a href="http://www.breezesys.com/DSLRRemotePro/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.breezesys.com/DSLRRemotePro/index.htm</a>) would keep up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamunique127</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66320</link>
		<dc:creator>iamunique127</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66320</guid>
		<description>I own and have used both Capture One 4 and Aperture 2. For me Aperture 2 is much more intuitive so I use it exclusively.
BTW Aperture 2 also has skin tone adjustments.
Thanks for the review. I&#039;ve been meaning to re-visit Capture One and this might be the nudge I needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own and have used both Capture One 4 and Aperture 2. For me Aperture 2 is much more intuitive so I use it exclusively.<br />
BTW Aperture 2 also has skin tone adjustments.<br />
Thanks for the review. I&#8217;ve been meaning to re-visit Capture One and this might be the nudge I needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellowledbetter</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66267</link>
		<dc:creator>yellowledbetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66267</guid>
		<description>thanks alot for putting this program to my attention!!
I&#039;ve been trying to get tethering possible for my eos 400D alot lately.
used the canon software but no luck there!
so when i saw your post about capture-one 4 pro i tried it right away
opened the program, hooked camera to pc, click....picture on pc!!!
so i&#039;m really happy that you posted this, cuz i was kinda stuck on the whole tethering photography
again, thanks!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks alot for putting this program to my attention!!<br />
I&#8217;ve been trying to get tethering possible for my eos 400D alot lately.<br />
used the canon software but no luck there!<br />
so when i saw your post about capture-one 4 pro i tried it right away<br />
opened the program, hooked camera to pc, click&#8230;.picture on pc!!!<br />
so i&#8217;m really happy that you posted this, cuz i was kinda stuck on the whole tethering photography<br />
again, thanks!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66261</guid>
		<description>I toiled over the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.ianbattersby.net/2009/04/29/the-great-raw-debate&quot; title=&quot;My blog post about Aperture vs Lightroom vs Capture One&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Great Raw Debate&lt;/a&gt; some months ago and now use Capture One 4 Pro exclusively for my initial RAW workflow using PS4 where required, I then finally move HQ JPEG copies into Aperture as a DAM system.

I love Capture One 4 Pro and not only for it&#039;s tethering, but also for it&#039;s control and quality. One downside it can be slugglish at times and suspect it could be greatly be improved &#039;under the bonnet&#039; should Phase One be inclined to do so - which they aren&#039;t (IMHO).

Great to read someone elses opinions/views - thanks :)

PS&gt; My views/opinions &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.ianbattersby.net/2009/04/29/the-great-raw-debate&quot; title=&quot;My blog post about Aperture vs Lightroom vs Capture One&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I toiled over the <a href="http://blog.ianbattersby.net/2009/04/29/the-great-raw-debate" title="My blog post about Aperture vs Lightroom vs Capture One" rel="nofollow">Great Raw Debate</a> some months ago and now use Capture One 4 Pro exclusively for my initial RAW workflow using PS4 where required, I then finally move HQ JPEG copies into Aperture as a DAM system.</p>
<p>I love Capture One 4 Pro and not only for it&#8217;s tethering, but also for it&#8217;s control and quality. One downside it can be slugglish at times and suspect it could be greatly be improved &#8216;under the bonnet&#8217; should Phase One be inclined to do so &#8211; which they aren&#8217;t (IMHO).</p>
<p>Great to read someone elses opinions/views &#8211; thanks <img src='http://www.digital-photography-school.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PS&gt; My views/opinions <a href="http://blog.ianbattersby.net/2009/04/29/the-great-raw-debate" title="My blog post about Aperture vs Lightroom vs Capture One" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/capture-one-4-pro-review/comment-page-1#comment-66259</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=8875#comment-66259</guid>
		<description>Kevin z, Justin &amp; Chuck, auto import isn&#039;t quick enough to be able to make strong decisions on the fly. As Sime said, if you have a model on the go who is on fire, you shoot away and I want to make sure I have THE shot before moving on to the next look, I want the imagery to be up on my screen as quickly as possible. Auto importing them is too slow and cumbersome. Seconds matter. How are you tethering your imagery from your camera to the auto import folder? I&#039;d be curious to know what software you were using. 

Reznor, as Vernon pointed out, if you are shooting 3-5 shots per second, you shouldn&#039;t be tethering. You are obviously shooting something like sport. Even if I was on set to shoot for a Sports brand, for instance a guy running full tilt down a running track and shooting at 5 frames a second, I wouldn&#039;t tether. Because of the nature of the work, I&#039;d be using ultra quick memory cards and swapping them out every 30-40 shots for my assistant to look through.

Lambert, You can indeed control the camera from your laptop. Being a fashion photographer, this option isn&#039;t much use to me. But for the Still Lifers out there it&#039;s a godsend! Making small adjustments and shooting from your laptop can save you lots of time. I guess this review was from my personal point of view. A fashion photographer wanting to tether and being a Lightroom user, would it replace what I already had.

Robd, I must confess to not knowing a heck of a lot about Aperture apart from when (prior to me using Lightroom) I tried it and it corrupted my library twice. So I binned it. I know a lot of people who use it though and swear by it and I am told Ap2 is nice piece of software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin z, Justin &amp; Chuck, auto import isn&#8217;t quick enough to be able to make strong decisions on the fly. As Sime said, if you have a model on the go who is on fire, you shoot away and I want to make sure I have THE shot before moving on to the next look, I want the imagery to be up on my screen as quickly as possible. Auto importing them is too slow and cumbersome. Seconds matter. How are you tethering your imagery from your camera to the auto import folder? I&#8217;d be curious to know what software you were using. </p>
<p>Reznor, as Vernon pointed out, if you are shooting 3-5 shots per second, you shouldn&#8217;t be tethering. You are obviously shooting something like sport. Even if I was on set to shoot for a Sports brand, for instance a guy running full tilt down a running track and shooting at 5 frames a second, I wouldn&#8217;t tether. Because of the nature of the work, I&#8217;d be using ultra quick memory cards and swapping them out every 30-40 shots for my assistant to look through.</p>
<p>Lambert, You can indeed control the camera from your laptop. Being a fashion photographer, this option isn&#8217;t much use to me. But for the Still Lifers out there it&#8217;s a godsend! Making small adjustments and shooting from your laptop can save you lots of time. I guess this review was from my personal point of view. A fashion photographer wanting to tether and being a Lightroom user, would it replace what I already had.</p>
<p>Robd, I must confess to not knowing a heck of a lot about Aperture apart from when (prior to me using Lightroom) I tried it and it corrupted my library twice. So I binned it. I know a lot of people who use it though and swear by it and I am told Ap2 is nice piece of software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/17 queries in 0.042 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 443/451 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-14 14:01:40 -->
