<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Introduction to Architectural Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Knop</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-159836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Knop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-159836</guid>
		<description>Good tips, a ts-e lens I would suggest as a must have for professional architectural photography.

If an amateur this is not as much of a deal as you can still adjust perspective in Photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good tips, a ts-e lens I would suggest as a must have for professional architectural photography.</p>
<p>If an amateur this is not as much of a deal as you can still adjust perspective in Photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Donnino</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-154270</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Donnino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-154270</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren

I was wondering how to price architectural photography. I want do this for realtors but have no idea what to charge.  Is it per view?  1/2 day rate?  Can you help?  Thanks

Frank Donnino
frank@donnino.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren</p>
<p>I was wondering how to price architectural photography. I want do this for realtors but have no idea what to charge.  Is it per view?  1/2 day rate?  Can you help?  Thanks</p>
<p>Frank Donnino<br />
<a href="mailto:frank@donnino.com">frank@donnino.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curb Appeal Photo (Rudy)</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-137710</link>
		<dc:creator>Curb Appeal Photo (Rudy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-137710</guid>
		<description>Hello Zinchuk, thanks for the great questions.

1. Sometimes I use a diffuser domes on the slaves, but not on the hand held. I find that firing the slaves into the walls or ceiling in adjacent rooms gives nice even lighting without needing a diffuser.  You can get great results from either method.
2. I operate my speedlights in remote mode (manual), I keep the angle as wide as possible to provide the widest spread.
3. I only rely on the camera meter setting to get the exposure close enough to fine tune with test shots.  I use center weighted matrix metering, with the maximum measuring area (13mm i think).  
4. To keep from blowing out windows I find the exposure combo that has the windows exposed the way I want them, then add the speedlights to fill the scene.  Using a high ISO with this technique will allow you get the most from your aperture and flash units.  Generally, a bright scene (maybe direct sunlight coming into a room through a window) will get a setting combo something like this:  ISO 1000, shutter speed 1/320(or whatever the max sync speed is for your flash units), an aperture between 7.1 and 9, and a flash power of 1/4.  This is enough to keep from blowing out the windows while keeping a bright, natural interior lighting. The photo of the bedroom above is a good example of this.
5.  I no longer concern myself with white balance while shooting.  I use Lightroom 3 for processing and the white balance tool combined with multi-image editing convenience means no more on location hassles.  As a back up, I keep a gray card with me that I will hide in a scene if necessary.  I can then use the eyedropper in Lightroom to pick that gray card as my neutral point.
6. Get the widest lens you can afford. I LOVE my Sigma 12mm.  If you go with the 24mm, you can still get great shots, but you will definitely be limited.

And to be clear, I definitely use a tighter aperture since I first wrote the piece.  My skills have evolved away from the wide aperture technique.

Good luck and happy shooting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Zinchuk, thanks for the great questions.</p>
<p>1. Sometimes I use a diffuser domes on the slaves, but not on the hand held. I find that firing the slaves into the walls or ceiling in adjacent rooms gives nice even lighting without needing a diffuser.  You can get great results from either method.<br />
2. I operate my speedlights in remote mode (manual), I keep the angle as wide as possible to provide the widest spread.<br />
3. I only rely on the camera meter setting to get the exposure close enough to fine tune with test shots.  I use center weighted matrix metering, with the maximum measuring area (13mm i think).<br />
4. To keep from blowing out windows I find the exposure combo that has the windows exposed the way I want them, then add the speedlights to fill the scene.  Using a high ISO with this technique will allow you get the most from your aperture and flash units.  Generally, a bright scene (maybe direct sunlight coming into a room through a window) will get a setting combo something like this:  ISO 1000, shutter speed 1/320(or whatever the max sync speed is for your flash units), an aperture between 7.1 and 9, and a flash power of 1/4.  This is enough to keep from blowing out the windows while keeping a bright, natural interior lighting. The photo of the bedroom above is a good example of this.<br />
5.  I no longer concern myself with white balance while shooting.  I use Lightroom 3 for processing and the white balance tool combined with multi-image editing convenience means no more on location hassles.  As a back up, I keep a gray card with me that I will hide in a scene if necessary.  I can then use the eyedropper in Lightroom to pick that gray card as my neutral point.<br />
6. Get the widest lens you can afford. I LOVE my Sigma 12mm.  If you go with the 24mm, you can still get great shots, but you will definitely be limited.</p>
<p>And to be clear, I definitely use a tighter aperture since I first wrote the piece.  My skills have evolved away from the wide aperture technique.</p>
<p>Good luck and happy shooting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zinchuk</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-137178</link>
		<dc:creator>Zinchuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-137178</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m making my first foray into real estate photography tomorrow, and am studying like mad to be ready. This was very informative, I must say.

I have a Nikon D700 with an 18-35 mm f3.5-4.5. That should give me a similar picture angle to your 12 mm on a D300. I also picked up another SB-600 today to give me three flashes for fill.

Do you use difuser domes on all your speedlights? Unfortunately, the SB-600 doesn&#039;t have one. 

Do you generally use a wide angle of flash, i.e. setting of 24 mm, as opposed to 50 or 70 mm?

Are you letting the matrix metering/CLS handle all the exposures. Do you use balanced lighting mode to ensure the windows are not blasted out?

Do you do a colour callibration for every room, and every angle? I have a reflector style callibration tool, as opposed to an exposedisk.

If this works out for me, I was seriously considering the 24 mm PC-E lens. However, it is not as wide as my 18-35. Is the ability to do perspective control worth the loss of addtional wide angle?

I, too, thought you would want f11 if at all possible, as opposed to f3.5 or f2.8.

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m making my first foray into real estate photography tomorrow, and am studying like mad to be ready. This was very informative, I must say.</p>
<p>I have a Nikon D700 with an 18-35 mm f3.5-4.5. That should give me a similar picture angle to your 12 mm on a D300. I also picked up another SB-600 today to give me three flashes for fill.</p>
<p>Do you use difuser domes on all your speedlights? Unfortunately, the SB-600 doesn&#8217;t have one. </p>
<p>Do you generally use a wide angle of flash, i.e. setting of 24 mm, as opposed to 50 or 70 mm?</p>
<p>Are you letting the matrix metering/CLS handle all the exposures. Do you use balanced lighting mode to ensure the windows are not blasted out?</p>
<p>Do you do a colour callibration for every room, and every angle? I have a reflector style callibration tool, as opposed to an exposedisk.</p>
<p>If this works out for me, I was seriously considering the 24 mm PC-E lens. However, it is not as wide as my 18-35. Is the ability to do perspective control worth the loss of addtional wide angle?</p>
<p>I, too, thought you would want f11 if at all possible, as opposed to f3.5 or f2.8.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curb Appeal Photo (Rudy)</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-133227</link>
		<dc:creator>Curb Appeal Photo (Rudy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 04:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-133227</guid>
		<description>I am the author. Barb, since I wrote this article I have refined my process to address the very issues you mention.  The softness and narrow depth of field at wide apertures will produce natural looking images but not very sharp ones.  Here is a new method:  ISO: 1000, Shutter speed: 1/320 (or whatever the max sync speed is for your speedlights), and a variable aperture. Even in bright situations using a high ISO allows the flexibility to fine tune within a wide depth of field.  Plus, the high ISO allows you to maximize the power of your speedlights.  The noise generated at a high ISO is easily reduced with Lightroom or Aperture.  Here is an example of a bright scene photographed using this technique. 

[eimg link=&#039;http://www.flickr.com/photos/rudylopez/5021693499/&#039; title=&#039;_DSC5827.jpg&#039; url=&#039;http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4125/5021693499_73b1812c4d.jpg&#039;]

EXIF: ISO1000, 1/320 @ 7.1.  Nikon D300 with Sigma 12mm.

This will let you your your wide angle with a lot more flexibility, I think you will like this technique a lot.

Rudy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the author. Barb, since I wrote this article I have refined my process to address the very issues you mention.  The softness and narrow depth of field at wide apertures will produce natural looking images but not very sharp ones.  Here is a new method:  ISO: 1000, Shutter speed: 1/320 (or whatever the max sync speed is for your speedlights), and a variable aperture. Even in bright situations using a high ISO allows the flexibility to fine tune within a wide depth of field.  Plus, the high ISO allows you to maximize the power of your speedlights.  The noise generated at a high ISO is easily reduced with Lightroom or Aperture.  Here is an example of a bright scene photographed using this technique. </p>
<p><a href='http://www.flickr.com/photos/rudylopez/5021693499/'><img src='http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4125/5021693499_73b1812c4d.jpg' title='_DSC5827.jpg' /></a></p>
<p>EXIF: ISO1000, 1/320 @ 7.1.  Nikon D300 with Sigma 12mm.</p>
<p>This will let you your your wide angle with a lot more flexibility, I think you will like this technique a lot.</p>
<p>Rudy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-132471</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-132471</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this informative article, I have to shoot some houses this week and this will help me no end. However, I have just put my canon 40D on a tripod, with remote cable and bounced external flash and done some test shots inside my house. Unfortunately I could only use my Sigma 17-70 today (but will be using a canon 10-22 for my shoot) and looking at my results, found that F2.8 produced just too soft an image. I tried shooting at F8 and F11, these gave me much better sharpness throughout the images. Of course this may be because of the lens I am using. When I use the wide angle, will I be able to use F2.8 and still have a sharp shot from back to front?? Or should I stick to F8 or F11? 
Thanks, barb
ps I was shooting with all manual settings, changing for each shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this informative article, I have to shoot some houses this week and this will help me no end. However, I have just put my canon 40D on a tripod, with remote cable and bounced external flash and done some test shots inside my house. Unfortunately I could only use my Sigma 17-70 today (but will be using a canon 10-22 for my shoot) and looking at my results, found that F2.8 produced just too soft an image. I tried shooting at F8 and F11, these gave me much better sharpness throughout the images. Of course this may be because of the lens I am using. When I use the wide angle, will I be able to use F2.8 and still have a sharp shot from back to front?? Or should I stick to F8 or F11?<br />
Thanks, barb<br />
ps I was shooting with all manual settings, changing for each shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-87653</link>
		<dc:creator>conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-87653</guid>
		<description>a good start for beginners but wide apertures? I never heard of an architectural photographer who didn&#039;t want more depth of field, and usually selected F11 or F16 only because F22 made diffraction a problem.


ce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a good start for beginners but wide apertures? I never heard of an architectural photographer who didn&#8217;t want more depth of field, and usually selected F11 or F16 only because F22 made diffraction a problem.</p>
<p>ce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-74873</link>
		<dc:creator>rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-74873</guid>
		<description>Author here. Use wide aperture (small f number) and long shutter times.  Many houses are very dark and having as much light as possible on the sensor without increasing ISO is what I recommend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author here. Use wide aperture (small f number) and long shutter times.  Many houses are very dark and having as much light as possible on the sensor without increasing ISO is what I recommend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-74620</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-74620</guid>
		<description>&quot;Use wide apertures and long shutter times&quot;

do you mean small apertures and long shutter times, or wide apertures and fast shutter times??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Use wide apertures and long shutter times&#8221;</p>
<p>do you mean small apertures and long shutter times, or wide apertures and fast shutter times??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathee</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-photography-school.com/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/comment-page-1#comment-73952</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/an-introduction-to-architectural-photography/#comment-73952</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing your information and techniques.  I&#039;m just starting to shoot real estate, and you have given the best tips I&#039;ve found so far.  Like several of the others, I would like your tips on making the view through the windows so perfect.  Mine sure didn&#039;t look like yours.  I loved the photos on your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing your information and techniques.  I&#8217;m just starting to shoot real estate, and you have given the best tips I&#8217;ve found so far.  Like several of the others, I would like your tips on making the view through the windows so perfect.  Mine sure didn&#8217;t look like yours.  I loved the photos on your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.074 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 441/448 objects using xcache

Served from: www.digital-photography-school.com @ 2012-02-15 01:02:39 -->
